How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework

By Camiel J. Beukeboom, Christian Burgers. 2019

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Language use plays a crucial role in the consensualization of stereotypes within cultural groups. Based on an integrative review of the literature on stereotyping and biased language use, we propose the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) framework. The framework integrates largely independent areas of literature and explicates the linguistic processes through which social-category stereotypes are shared and maintained. We distinguish two groups of biases in language use that jointly feed and maintain three fundamental cognitive variables in (shared) social-category cognition: perceived category entitativity, stereotype content, and perceived essentialism of associated stereotypic characteristics. These are: (1) Biases in linguistic labels used to denote categories, within which we discuss biases in (a) label content and (b) linguistic form of labels; (2) Biases in describing behaviors and characteristics of categorized individuals, within which we discuss biases in (a) communication content (i.e., what information is communicated), and (b) linguistic form of descriptions (i.e., how is information formulated). Together, these biases create a self-perpetuating cycle in which social-category stereotypes are shared and maintained. The framework allows for a better understanding of stereotype maintaining biases in natural language. We discuss various opportunities for further research.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Natural Language Processing, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. L. Elisa Celis
  2. Hal Daumé Iii
  3. Hanna M. Wallach
  4. Solon Barocas
  5. Svetlana Kiritchenko
  6. Su Lin Blodgett
  7. Vijay Keswani
  8. Saif M. Mohammad

In Language and Linguistics

  1. L. Elisa Celis
  2. Vijay Keswani
  3. Marco Turchi
  4. Hal Daumé Iii
  5. Matteo Negri
  6. Su Lin Blodgett

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Su Lin Blodgett
  2. L. Elisa Celis
  3. Hal Daumé Iii
  4. Hanna M. Wallach
  5. Xia Hu
  6. Solon Barocas
  7. Svetlana Kiritchenko
  8. Isar Nejadgholi

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Hal Daumé Iii
  2. Matteo Negri
  3. Su Lin Blodgett
  4. Svetlana Kiritchenko
  5. Marco Turchi
  6. L. Elisa Celis
  7. Vijay Keswani
  8. Isar Nejadgholi

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Su Lin Blodgett
  2. Hal Daumé Iii
  3. Svetlana Kiritchenko
  4. L. Elisa Celis
  5. Vijay Keswani
  6. Isar Nejadgholi
  7. Hanna M. Wallach
  8. Marco Turchi

Citations in the corpus