Self-uncertainty and Support for Autocratic Leadership

By David E. Rast, M. Hogg, S. Giessner. 2013

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/632a2992fe61663516e3e6ea51f3416024efcdec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Nicolas Barreto
2. M. Hogg
3. D. van Knippenberg
4. Barbara van Knippenberg

In Social Psychology

1. Nicolas Barreto
2. M. Hogg
3. D. van Knippenberg
4. David de Cremer
5. Barbara van Knippenberg
6. David E. Rast
7. S. A. Haslam
8. S. Giessner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nicolas Barreto
2. M. Hogg
3. D. van Knippenberg
4. David de Cremer
5. Barbara van Knippenberg
6. David E. Rast
7. R. Crisp
8. S. Giessner

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: a meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research (2017, background): “This follows both the ingroup bias argument mentioned above (Hogg et al., 2012a; Rast et al., 2012, 2013), and the idea that leaders who are more prototypical tend to be seen as having the group’s best interests at heart, which makes group members trust that leader more (Giessner & Van Knippenberg,…”
• Uncertain Self in a Changing World: A Foundation for Radicalisation, Populism, and Autocratic Leadership (2020, background): “Adapted from Rast et al. (2013), N = 215.”