Successfully Combining Meta-analysis and Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations and Strategies

By Ronald S. Landis. 2013

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/233af7140b46d19387a4315124b2821bfc534205

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Information Systems and Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Four Research Designs and a Comprehensive Analysis Strategy for Investigating Common Method Variance with Self-Report Measures Using Latent Variables (2016, unknown): “SEM (Landis 2013), and historiography (Zickar 2015).”
Impact of informal institutions on the prevalence, strategy, and performance of family firms: A meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “To deal with sample size differences across the correlation coefficients included in the matrix, the analysis is based on the harmonic mean sample size (Landis, 2013).”
Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta–Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models (2012, methodology): “The primary advantage of theorydriven meta-analysis is the possibility to assess structural models that have not been studied in primary studies before (Landis, 2013).”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “…meta-analytic structural equation modeling (SEM) in Mplus to examine the mediating effects of supervisory-focused justice and organizationally focused justice and to compare the effects of abusive supervision on justice perceptions (Cheung and Chan 2005; Landis 2013; Viswesvaran and Ones 1995).”
The drivers of work engagement: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence (2020, methodology): “Also, Landis (2013) recommends TSSEM as the method of choice for meta-analytic structural equation modelling if at least one study provides a full correlation matrix.”
Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review (2015, unknown): “Future systematic reviews can integrate the results from this and other meta-analyses, such as Schyns and Schilling (2013) review of the consequences of destructive leadership, to investigate potential mediators using meta-path analysis (Landis 2013).”
Factors Affecting Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Study. (2015, background): “Landis (2013) states that there are at least two primary approaches that serve as a foundation for integrating MA and SEM.”
Why do people play games? A meta-analysis (2017, methodology): “Based on recommendations offered in literature (Landis 2013), we decided to use the harmonic mean.”
Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “We also followed recent recommendations for these analyses in the organizational sciences (e.g., Bergh et al., 2014; Landis, 2013).”
Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How (2014, methodology): “For further discussion on this see Landis and Dunlap (2000).”
The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies (2018, methodology): “Landis (2013) recommends TSSEM as the method of choice if at least one study provides a full correlation matrix – a great potential to evaluate research questions which have not been examined within the individual studies before.”
Leadership behaviors and follower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theoretical rationales and underlying mechanisms (2017, unknown): “We implemented all procedures following best-practice recommendations as described by Bergh et al. (2016) and Landis (2013).”