CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes

By Stephen Nayfach, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Frederik Schulz, Emily Eloe-Fadrosh, Simon Roux, Nikos Kyrpides. Nature Biotechnology, 2020

1,593 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Millions of new viral sequences have been identified from metagenomes, but the quality and completeness of these sequences vary considerably. Here we present CheckV, an automated pipeline for identifying closed viral genomes, estimating the completeness of genome fragments and removing flanking host regions from integrated proviruses. CheckV estimates completeness by comparing sequences with a large database of complete viral genomes, including 76,262 identified from a systematic search of publicly available metagenomes, metatranscriptomes and metaviromes. After validation on mock datasets and comparison to existing methods, we applied CheckV to large and diverse collections of metagenome-assembled viral sequences, including IMG/VR and the Global Ocean Virome. This revealed 44,652 high-quality viral genomes (that is, >90% complete), although the vast majority of sequences were small fragments, which highlights the challenge of assembling viral genomes from short-read metagenomes. Additionally, we found that removal of host contamination substantially improved the accurate identification of auxiliary metabolic genes and interpretation of viral-encoded functions. The quality of viral genomes assembled from metagenome data is assessed by CheckV.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21818286078368e92b4a84194872737ee45732ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Nikos Kyrpides
  2. Dmitry Meleshko
  3. I-Min A. Chen
  4. David Páez-Espino
  5. Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh
  6. Natalia N. Ivanova
  7. Anton I. Korobeynikov
  8. Jillian F. Banfield

In Molecular Biology

  1. Nikos Kyrpides
  2. Dmitry Meleshko
  3. Mosè Manni
  4. I-Min A. Chen
  5. Jillian F. Banfield
  6. Mathieu Seppey
  7. Matthew Berkeley
  8. Tanja Woyke

In Plant Science

  1. Natalia N. Ivanova
  2. I-Min A. Chen
  3. David Páez-Espino
  4. Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh
  5. Anton I. Korobeynikov
  6. Jillian F. Banfield
  7. E. Zdobnov
  8. Rayan Chikhi

Citations in the corpus