Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance

By Robert W. Lent, Janet A. Schmidt, L. Schmidt. 2006

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Information Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2178c3d114083e8c736014943d0c8006f1f98db6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Kim Klyver
2. I. Clark
3. Ying Chen
4. Xiaohu Zhou

In Information Systems

1. Kim Klyver
2. I. Clark
3. Ying Chen
4. Xiaohu Zhou

In Social Psychology

1. Greg J. Sears
2. Aaron C. H. Schat
3. Kim Klyver
4. I. Clark
5. Ying Chen
6. Kevin Tasa
7. Xiaohu Zhou
8. Yair Berson

Citations in the corpus

• Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning (2012, background): “Collective efficacy Although research on SCT has emphasized individual-level mechanisms (e.g., selfefficacy) and outcomes, “the theory is also concerned with how people work together within teams and other social units” (Lent et al. 2006, p. 74).”
• Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross‐level moderating role of collective efficacy (2011, background): “High efficacy teams are generally positive environments that are characterized by engagement, camaraderie, and cohesion (Gibson & Earley, 2007; Lent et al., 2006).”
• Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment (2018, methodology): “Collective efficacy Seven items generated from previous studies were used to measure collective efficacy (Edmondson 1999; Lent et al. 2006).”