The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change

By Sukjin Kang, Lawrence C. Scharmann, Taehee Noh, H. Koh. 2005

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Education, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f6193396b7161af855ea480a245b4b84b2b0a0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Gale M. Sinatra

In Education

1. Lawrence C. Scharmann
2. Taehee Noh
3. Sukjin Kang
4. Hunsik Kang
5. Marcus Johnson
6. Gale M. Sinatra
7. Doug Lombardi
8. E. Michael Nussbaum

In Safety Research

1. Gale M. Sinatra

Citations in the corpus

• Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change (2010, background): “…by various factors such as students‘ characteristics, domain specificity, and social context (Ainley et al., 2002; Chen & Darst, 2002; Duit & Treagust, 2003; Kang et al., 2005; Limón, 2001; Sacco & Bucciarelli, 2008; Sinatra & Pintrich, 2003; Zohar & Aharon-Kravetsky, 2005; Zusho & Pintrich, 2003).”
• Use of Task-Value Instructional Inductions for Facilitating Engagement and Conceptual Change. (2013, background): “Johnson and Sinatra (2009) and Kang et al. (2005) suggest that there may be motivational elements that are more potent in facilitating conceptual change, than mast ery goals alone.”