Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction

By Tanya N. Beran, J. Rokosh. 2009

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ce98d97239cd72f862d3f8ce52e07b88e8a4fba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Bert Brockx
2. Jonas Flodén
3. D. Mortelmans
4. P. Spooren

In Education

1. Bert Brockx
2. Jonas Flodén
3. D. Mortelmans
4. P. Spooren
5. H. Hornstein
6. M. Goos
7. A. Salomons

In Social Psychology

1. Bert Brockx
2. Jonas Flodén
3. D. Mortelmans
4. P. Spooren
5. H. Hornstein
6. M. Goos
7. A. Salomons

Citations in the corpus

• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Beran and Rokosh (2009) reported from a survey to 262 university teachers that 84% of the respondents support the use of SET in general, and that 62% of the respondents feel that department heads and deans make proper use of SET reports.”
• The impact of student feedback on teaching in higher education (2017, methodology): “However, other studies show a more negative view of the evaluation where teachers do not perceive the feedback as valid (Simpson and Siguaw 2000) or see it as only marginally valuable (Beran and Rokosh 2009).”