The path to corporate responsibility.

By S. Zadek. Harvard Business Review, 2004

802 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b6286d57be72cf3b1ef1609df84721ac0f99a15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives – a Stakeholder Theory Perspective (2008, background): “Thus, standardized ethics initiatives are appealing since they point managers’ attention to chronically undervalued costs of ethical failure such as employee turnover or damaged employee morale (Thomas et al., 2004, p. 58; also Goyder and Desmond, 2000; Zadek, 2004).”
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “Some of these activities take place at an individual corporate level; for instance, when Nike developed and imposed a code of conduct on its direct suppliers (Zadek, 2004).”
Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment (2015, background): “…to public concerns about auto emissions, engaged in CSR activities toward society and developed the hybrid Prius, which not only significantly reduces pollutants and protects the natural environment, but also gives Toyota a lead position in hybrid technology (Porter, Kramer, & Zadek, 2007).”
A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “For instance, there is evidence that activists attempt to hold companies to industry-leading social performance practices (Christmann, 2004; Zadek, 2004).”
The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World – A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy (2011, neutral): “2007; Porter and Kramer 2006; Zadek 2004) and a leadership challenge (Maak and Pless 2006).”
Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance (2006, background): “Their study extended the work of previous researchers demonstrating that consumers are more willing to punish the bad behavior of firms more than they are willing to reward their good behavior.43 Similarly, Orlitzky and Benjamin meta-analyzed the degree of firms’ financial risk (including market ris”
Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior (2014, background): “Firms caught up in scandals risk consumer boycotts that can result in financial losses (Fombrun et al., 2000; Zadek, 2004).”
Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains (2008, background): “array of distinct public and private, local and global actors engaged in the formulation of standards and, on the ways in which standards have become central to debates on the structure and organization of GVCs (Messner, 1997, 2004; Clapp, 1998, 2005; Finger and Tamiotti, 1999; O’Riordan, 2000; O’Ro”
Adoption of corporate social responsibility – incorporating a stakeholder perspective (2006, background): “In “the path to Corporate Responsibility” Zadek (2004)”