Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives – a Stakeholder Theory Perspective

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “…self-regulation moves center stage in the overall debate on corporate responsibility (see e.g. Dahan, Doh, & Guay, 2006; Fransen & Kolk, 2007; Gilbert & Rasche, 2008; Scherer & Palazzo, 2011; Teegen, Doh, & Vachani, 2004; Vogel, 2010; Waddock, 2008), connecting the latter to the debate on…”
The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards (2013, unknown): “Similarly, Gilbert and Rasche (2007, 2008) adopted the term ‘‘standardized ethics initiative’’ to encompass the wide set of ‘‘voluntary (usually global) standards defining norms and procedures for organizational behavior with regard to social and/or environmental issues’’ and point out three…”
Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards (2011, background): “…set of initiatives “international accountability standards” and define them as voluntary predefined rules, procedures and methods to systematically assess, measure, audit and/or communicate the social and environmental behaviour and/or performance of firms (Gilbert & Rasche, 2008; Rasche, 2009a).”