Evidence of Halo Effects in Student Evaluations of Communication Instruction

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Relationships of Student End-of-Class Motivation with Teacher Communication Behaviors and Instructional Outcomes (2006, background): “This commonly occurs when individual respondents complete multiple measures involving similar (but even very distinct) constructs (Feeley, 2002a, 2002b).”
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Significant correlations (ranging between .28 and .72) have been observed among all measures in the SET instrument developed by Feeley (2002), which also includes irrelevant measures (e.g., physical attractiveness).”
Accounting Undergraduates' Perceptions of Cooperative Learning as a Model for Enhancing their Interpersonal and Communication Skills to Interface Successfully with Professional Accountancy Education and Training (2009, background): “Furthermore, the possibility of a halo effect causing errors in the reported students’ attitudes to skills development should also be acknowledged (see for example, Cooper, 1981; Pike, 1999; Feeley, 2002).”
Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? (2008, background): “com ratings did not reflect student learning, but were characterized by a halo effect (Feeley 2002).”
Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness (2004, background): “Feeley (2002) finds a positive correlation between physical attractiveness and effectiveness ratings (0.40).”