Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness
By James Felton *, John B. Mitchell, Michael Stinson. 2004
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bd41e8a6f20acbc4a2e19432357df7f693fb1a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Andrew S. Rosen
- M. Goos
- A. Salomons
- Bert Brockx
- Elizabeth Davison
- Jammie Price
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
In Social Psychology
- Andrew S. Rosen
- M. Goos
- A. Salomons
- Bert Brockx
- Elizabeth Davison
- Jammie Price
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
Citations in the corpus
- The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education (2015, unknown): “A study by Felton, Mitchell, and Stinson (2004) found that students’ ratings of lecturer quality were strongly correlated with ratings given for course easiness and lecturer’s attractiveness.”
- Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? (2008, background): “Felton et al. (2004) analyzed overall professor quality ratings as a function of easiness and sexiness ratings.”
- Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations (2017, background): “19 With the notable exception of work on websites such as ratemyprofessor.com: e.g. see Felton et al. (2004, 2008); Timmerman (2008).”
- RateMyProfessors com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching (2007, background): “…more difficult his or her class can be while obtaining high-marks on student evaluations” (p. 106).3 In an analysis involving non-sexy instructors only, Felton et al. (2004) found also that the correlation between easiness and quality grew stronger when based on increasingly more selective…”
- On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “As identified by Felton, Mitchell, and Stinson (2004), there is a positive correlation between overall ratings and the leniency and sexiness of instructors (correlations were .61 and .30, respectively).”
- How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations (2009, background): “This paper contributes to the emerging literature (see Felton et al. 2004; Coladarci and Kornfield 2007) that provides information on the services and disservices of this popular website to the academic community.”
- Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: student evaluations of professors on Ratemyprofessors.com (2008, unknown): “Our findings extend the research of Felton et al.(2004).”
- Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of RateMyProfessors.com data (2018, methodology): “Felton et al. (2008) provided an update to the work of Felton, Mitchell, and Stinson (2004) by considering a larger data-set of 6582 faculty members and hotness scores that included both positive and negative values.”