Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements
By Laura T. Raynolds. 2000
628 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1396de1e66eb0f387cdb96644efe82eb6e0fd425
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Organic and conventional agriculture: Materializing discourse and agro-ecological managerialism (2000, background): “The changing character of California organic agriculture, conflicts over organic regulatory regimes, and international fair trade movements (Raynolds, 2000) are different facets of a common worldwide struggle: to sustain and create alternatives to the centralizing strategies of agri-business capital”
- The “Fair Trade” Effect (2012, background): “Moreover, ethical claims are also highly politicized given that they aim to promote progressive socioeconomic values in the marketplace (Raynolds, 2000), which may increase pressure to justify one’s support for these claims, perhaps by judging products bearing these claims more favorably.”
- Towards a theory of values-based labeling (2002, background): “For her, the fair trade movement has the potential to be an “effective oppositional movement” to the extent that it can “challenge the abstract capitalist relations that fuel exploitation in the global agro-food system,” primarily by “challenging market competitiveness based solely on price” ( Rayno”
- The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research (2004, background): “The two visions of Fair Trade (a working model and the challenge to orthodoxy) inevitably create an element of tension, with Fair Trade operating simultaneously “inside and outside” (Renard, 2003, p.92) or “in and against” (Raynolds, 2000, p.299) the market.”
- In the Market But Not of It: Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewardship Council Certification as Market-Based Social Change (2005, background): “Trades roots lie in an Alternative Trade movement committed to operating both ‘‘in and against the market,’’ aiming to use the market to transform the market (Brown, 1993; Raynolds, 2000; Renard, 2003; Shreck, in press).”
- Agri-Food Markets towards Sustainable Patterns (2020, background): “Like organics, Fairtrade relies on transparency in the flow of information [343].”
- What do Corporations have to do with Fair Trade? Positive and Normative Analysis from a Value Chain Perspective (2009, background): “Such a demise of northern ATOs, along with a preference by corporations for plantation production, could effectively eliminate the access of small producers to the fair trade market over the long term (Murray et al., 2006; Frundt, 2005; Murray and Raynolds, 2000).”
- Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards (2010, positive): “As such, argue some observers, they represent a form of social regulation, a partial Polanyian “re-embedding” of markets in systems of social and moral relations (Jaffee 2007; Mutersbaugh 2005; Raynolds 2000).”
- Food and Globalization (2006, background): “…researchers are wise enough not to point to fair trade as a panacea, there are glimmerings of hope that these efforts raise incomes for producers and improve the quality of their environment (McKenna & Campbell 2002; Murray & Raynolds 2000; Raynolds & Murray 1998; Raynolds 2000, 2002; Renard 1999).”
- Product, Process and Place (2005, background): “2 Other notable examples include: Barham (2003), AOC labels in France; de Roest and Menghi (2000), PDO/PGI labels in Italy; Busch (2000), examples of US and European labels and standards; Raynolds (2000) , international organic and fair-trade labels.”
- Environmental Certification of Forests in Mexico: The Political Ecology of a Nongovernmental Market Intervention (2006, background): “Forest certification researchers have parallel interests in the mechanism’s environmental impact and North-South development implications, especially the uneven spread of forest certification in the forests of the South (Molnar 2003; Rametsteiner and Simula 2003; Morris and Dunne 2004).”