Environmental Certification of Forests in Mexico: The Political Ecology of a Nongovernmental Market Intervention

By D. Klooster. 2006

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3514c139c3c234dbc561648d301f04dcaffb43a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Berndt
2. Richard Perkins
3. M. Boeckler
4. Eric Neumayer
5. L. Head
6. J. Atchison
7. D. Klooster
8. G. Auld

In Plant Science

1. J. Atchison
2. C. Berndt
3. Richard Perkins
4. M. Boeckler
5. Eric Neumayer
6. L. Head
7. D. Klooster
8. G. Auld

In Strategy and Management

1. Eric Neumayer
2. Richard Perkins
3. D. Klooster
4. C. Berndt
5. M. Boeckler
6. L. Head
7. J. Atchison
8. G. Auld

Citations in the corpus

• Global land governance: from territory to flow? (2013, background): “Certification schemes have problems accommodating local forms of resources management even if they are designed to promote sustainable production [66].”
• Geographies of markets: Materials, morals and monsters in motion (2011, background): “, 2010; Trabalzi, 2007), and the interplay between various conventions in efforts to establish ‘green’ commodity networks (see Baird and Quastel, forthcoming; Klooster, 2006).”
• Cultural ecology: emerging human-plant geographies (2009, background): “Although we focus fi rst on food because it dominates the new plant stories (or biogeographies), it is important to note that a range of non-food plants have received similar attention (eg, Isaacman, 1996; Coulson, 2004; Klooster, 2006).”
• Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. (2010, background): “…as they theorize certification systems as instruments of social movements attempting to re-regulate commodity networks in order to protect labor and environmental attributes endangered by neoliberalization (Barham, 2002; Barnett et al., 2005; Mutersbaugh, 2005; Klooster, 2006; Guthman, 2007).”
• Geographic Variations in the Early Diffusion of Corporate Voluntary Standards: Comparing ISO 14001 and the Global Compact (2010, background): “…two decades has been the growth of voluntary corporate responsibility (CR) standards governing the behavior of firms in areas such as environmental sustainability, labor rights, and corruption (Angel et al, 2007; Christopherson and Lillie, 2005; Hughes et al, 2007; Klooster, 2006; Nadvi, 2008).”