Workplace Relationship Quality and Employee Information Experiences

By Patricia M. Sias. 2005

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13693f271abf03579d62dedcdcd4a1dff4185f0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Space Between Us: A Social-Functional Emotions View of Ambivalent and Indifferent Workplace Relationships (2017, background): “Existing definitions of workplace relationships, including those between supervisors and subordinates, leaders and followers, peer coworkers, and employees and external stakeholders (Ferris et al., 2009; Sias, 2005; Uzzi, 1997), reveal interactions and emotions as key components.”
Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior (2017, background): “…LMX relationship may increase the saliency of the costs associated with voicing one s thoughts and concerns, high-quality LMX relationships also provide important informational cues that may help employees understand when and how to communicate such information to the leader (Sias, 2005).”
A multilevel analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work (2008, unknown): “…is that workplace friendships are unique interpersonal relationships that employees develop and maintain by choice, not compulsion; and they are willing to spend time with one another beyond their formal role expected within other relationships in organizations (Sias & Cahill, 1998; Sias, 2005).”
Strengthening the Tie: Creating Exchange Relationships That Encourage Employee Advocacy as an Organizational Citizenship Behavior (2018, background): “When firms provide quality information and engage in open communication, they create positive relationships with employees (Sias, 2005).”