Convergence in Environmental Reporting: Assessing the Carbon Disclosure Project

By Daniel C. Matisoff, Douglas S. Noonan, J. J. O'Brien. 2013

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51e3b52a6392a769ecebdf94b7a47e4647ab34e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. A. Gerged
2. Halil Akbas
3. Stefan Lewandowski
4. Seda Cani̇kli̇
5. Timo Busch

In Marketing

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. A. Gerged
3. Halil Akbas
4. Seda Cani̇kli̇
5. Timo Busch

In Strategy and Management

1. Stefan Lewandowski
2. A. Gerged
3. Halil Akbas
4. Seda Cani̇kli̇
5. Timo Busch

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis (2018, background): “The transparency and quality of emission data remains low (Matisoff et al. 2013) so that “neither the level of carbon disclosure [ . . . ] nor the more detailed carbon accounting provide information that is particularly valuable for investors” (Kolk et al. 2008).”
• Determinants of Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Turkish Firms (2018, background): “Many studies relate voluntary GHG disclosure to the profitability, as high profit companies need to be seen as environmentally responsible [12,52,63,66,75].”
• Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures (2020, background): “In the US, for instance, CED, in a multi-sector study, recorded 81.8% of the examined environmental items (Matisoff et al., 2013).”