Does Board Structure in Banks Really Affect Their Performance

By Shams Pathan, R. Faff. 2013

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1324f36e4a548a553a69a598dadfcc3651fb2589

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance? (2016, methodology): “Following Vu and Turnell (2011) and Pathan and Faff (2013), this study also uses the following control variables: bank size, capital strength, ROA as a proxy of profitability, the loans-to-deposits ratio as a proxy of liquidity, and a dummy variable for time”
Age diversity, directors' personal values, and bank performance (2016, background): “Banking holds a unique role in a nation’s economy, and poor bank governance is more likely to trigger bank failure, leading to serious systemic risk and negative externalities (Pathan, 2009; Pathan and Faff, 2013; García-Meca et al., 2015).”
Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity (2016, background): “Female board members are more prepared for meetings (Pathan and Faff 2013) and attend more board meetings (Adams and Ferreira 2009).”
Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence (2020, methodology): “…performance, we apply the corporate governance-firm performance model in a dynamic framework as adopted by several empirical studies of corporate governance and firm performance (see Chen, Chidambaran, Imerman, & Sopranzetti, 2014; Nguyen et al., 2015; Pathan & Faff, 2013; Wintoki et al., 2012).”
Governance, Efficiency and Risk Taking in Chinese Banking (2017, unknown): “Following Pathan and Faff (2013), we expect statistically significant AR(1) due to the”
Board diversity and financial fragility: Evidence from European banks (2017, background): “Moreover, there is no formal theory that interprets the diversityperformance nexus, therefore the existing literature largely relies on the results of the empirical studies of non-financial companies (Pathan and Faff, 2013).”
The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards (2018, unknown): “Many papers have studied the impact of boards’ gender composition on firm performance and a few have studied it in the banking industry specifically (Adams and Mehran, 2012; Garcia-Meca et al, 2015; Berger et al, 2014; Pathan and Faff, 2013), showing mixed results.”
Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China (2014, background): “The proportion of female directors is about 10%, which is slightly higher than the figure for US bank holding companies as reported in Pathan and Faff (2013).”
Corporate governance and credit rating in Islamic banks: Does Shariah governance matters? (2015, background): “As well, Pathan and Faff (2013) ﬁnd that women directors in the boardroom improve bank performance with caveats.”
Exploring the Nexus Between Human Capital, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Islamic Banks (2017, unknown): “For instance, Pathan and Faff (2013) posited that a higher fraction of independent board directors (non-executive director, NED) on the board dampens bank performance.”
Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance : conventional vs. Islamic banks (2015, methodology): “In contrast, Pathan and Faff (2013) report that both board”
Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance (2018, methodology): “We therefore follow Pathan and Faff (2013) and employ the two-step system GMM approach proposed by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998), which accommodates the possible dynamic endogeneity between risk and independent variables by means of appropriate instruments.”