Effectiveness and Efficiency of Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer: An Empirical Examination

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measures for Dealing with Competence and Integrity Violations of Interorganizational Trust at the Corporate and Operating Levels of Organizational Hierarchy (2009, positive): “There are many benefits to sustaining trusting relationships between organizations (e.g. Becerra et al., 2008; Das and Teng, 1998; Krishnan et al., 2006; Mohr and Spekman, 1994; Parkhe, 1998; Perez-Nordtvedt et al., 2008; Saxton, 1997; Zaheer and Venkatraman, 1995; Zaheer et al., 1998).”
Individual connectedness in innovation networks: On the role of individual motivation (2013, background): “Motivation is central to learning and lack of motivation can hinder knowledge transfer (Pérez-Nordtvedt et al., 2008).”
Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion (2012, background): “Industries were classified into high and low technology, based on multiple sources (e.g., National Science Foundation 2000; Oakey et al. 1988 ).”
Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects (2008, background): “For instance, Pérez-Nordtvedt et al. (2008) asked respondents to identify the characteristics of knowledge based on the value of assets in the resourcebased view (i.e. value, rareness, inimitability, and non-substitutability).”