Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts
By Sankar Sen, Zeynep Gürhan‐Canli, Vicki G. Morwitz. 2001
615 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1229b9c45c08b32d429ba8451a40af05965daa6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Safety Research
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Purpose and object of anti-consumption ☆ (2009, background): “…the potential to impact negatively on companies’ bottom-lines, several studies have already investigated this specific form of anti-consumption (Carty, 2002; Ethical Consumer 2005; Lee et al., in press; Klein et al., 2004; Mikkelson and Mikkelson, 2005; Sen et al., 2001; Penaloza and Price, 1993).”
- Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation (2004, background): “Consistent with the articles by Sen, Gürhan-Canli, and Morwitz (2001) and John and Klein (2003), we view boycotting as a form of prosocial behavior by which “actions [are] intended to benefit one or more people other than oneself—behaviors such as helping, comforting, sharing, and cooperation”…”
- How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review (2011, neutral): “Cash donations (Philanthropy) Ricks (2005); Sen et al. (2006)”