The Best of Both Worlds: Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data Using Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling

By Angelika Glockner-Rist, Herbert Hoijtink. 2003

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/114524f576045ff68fb8a13e0494c2db80b91013

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. M. Bal
2. E. S. Kim
3. Annet de Lange
4. D. Kooij
5. Paul G. W. Jansen
6. Myeongsun Yoon
7. J. Dikkers
8. R. Haase

Citations in the corpus

• Differential Item Functioning Detection Using the Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes Method with a Pure Short Anchor (2009, unknown): “In recent years, MIMIC methods have been used to detect DIF (Finch, 2005; Fleishman, Spector, & Altman, 2002; Gallo, Anthony, & Muthén, 1994; Glöckner-Rist & Hoitjink, 2003; Levine et al., 2003; MacIntosh & Hashim, 2003; Muthén, 1985, 1988; Muthén, Kao, & Burstein, 1991; Oort, 1998).”
• Why Ordinal Variables Can (Almost) Always Be Treated as Continuous Variables: Clarifying Assumptions of Robust Continuous and Ordinal Factor Analysis Estimation Methods (2020, background): “The assumption of latent normality corresponds to the graded response model with a probit link function (Takane and de Leeuw, 1987; Glockner-Rist and Hoijtink, 2003; Kamata and Bauer, 2008).”
• How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies (2013, methodology): “Because CFA is not possible with dichotomous variables, we first calculated tetrachoric correlations based on the cross-tabulations between the perceived availability of all HR practices (Glöckner-Rist and Hoijtink, 2003; Uebersax, 2006).”
• Testing Measurement Invariance: A Comparison of Multiple-Group Categorical CFA and IRT (2011, background): “Let us suppose that a measure of depression has an item about crying (Glockner-Rist & Hoijtink, 2003).”
• Managing aging workers: a mixed methods study on bundles of HR practices for aging workers (2014, methodology): “Because a CFA is not possible with dichotomous variables, we first calculated tetrachoric correlations based on the cross-tabulations between the perceived availability of all HR practices (Glöckner-Rist and Hoijtink 2003; Uebersax 2006).”
• Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “Researchers now use SEM to test designs that include interactions and other nonlinear effects (e.g., Schumaker & Marcoulides, 1998), experimental manipulations (e.g., Russell, Kahn, Altmeir, & Spoth, 1998), and dichotomous variables (e.g., Glockner-Rist & Hoijtink, 2003).”
• The MIMIC Model as a Method for Detecting DIF: Comparison With Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT Likelihood Ratio (2005, methodology): “Recently, several authors have discussed the link between item response theory (IRT) models and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for dichotomous variables (Fleishman, Spector & Altman, 2002; Glockner-Rist & Hoitjink, 2003; MacIntosh & Hashim, 2003).”
• Leadership and Team Cohesiveness Across Cultures (2009, methodology): “It is unnecessary to check for measurement invariance using item response theory techniques (Scandura et al., 2001) because the scales of our instruments are 6 point-scales, and in this case item response theory and structural equationmodeling are equivalent (Glöckner-Rist & Hoijting, 2003).”
• Evaluating Measurement Invariance of TALIS 2013 Complex Scales: Comparison between Continuous and Categorical Multiple-Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses (2014, unknown): “Other way, as suggest in Glockner-Rist and Hoijtink (2003) for assessing the thresholds in categorical items, is to assess the invariance of the thresholds while holding the factor loadings constant across groups.”