Research on work engagement is well and alive
By Sabine Sonnentag. 2011
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10d6663eb77e03d096099ec00cf78c2cd9d6b811
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- H. Cooper–Thomas
- Adriana Viljevac
- K. Upadyaya
- K. Salmela‐Aro
- F. V. D. Walt
- A. Saks
- Caroline F. Mansfield
- A. Woods-McConney
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. Upadyaya
- K. Salmela‐Aro
- A. Saks
- H. Cooper–Thomas
- Caroline F. Mansfield
- Adriana Viljevac
- A. Woods-McConney
- Angela F. Y. Siu
Citations in the corpus
- Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach (2014, unknown): “Sonnentag(2011)hasarguedthatexaminingengagementfromdaytodaymightevenbetoorough of an assessment, and she proposes that engagement may fluctuate from hour to hour, similar to the within-day fluctuations of job performance (Beal et al. 2005).”
- Workplace spirituality, work engagement and thriving at work (2018, background): “It has been found that work engagement can become fairly stable over the long term, but that it may fluctuate from week to week, from day to day and even from hour to hour (Sonnentag, 2011).”
- From job demands and resources to work engagement, burnout, life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, and occupational health (2016, background): “Moreover, our results showed that both work engageent and burnout are positively associated with workaholism, robably reflecting the dark side of engagement (Bakker et al., 011; Salmela-Aro, 2015; Sonnentag, 2011).”
- Teachers’ Engagement at Work: An International Validation Study (2012, background): “The most recent conceptualizations of work motivation emphasize the key elements of energy and involvement in the workplace (Bakker, Albercht, & Leiter, 2011), and recognize that engagement is dynamic, not static, with fluctuations possible from day-to-day and week-to-week, and even from task-to-tas”
- An investigation into the validity of two measures of work engagement (2012, methodology): “Of these, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (Schaufeli, Salanova, Gonzalez-Roma and Bakker 2002) is the most frequently used (Sonnentag 2003, 2011; Salanova and Schaufeli 2008; Xanthopoulou et al. 2009).”