Decision-Making Process of Internal Whistleblowing Behavior in China: Empirical Evidence and Implications

By J. Zhang, R. Chiu, Liqun Wei. 2009

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f7d3dcb35e9becc373ec4d40e137b6f4c0330e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Information Systems and Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing (2012, background): “More idealistic individuals are generally of the opinion that internal disclosure is the only moral action, because disclosing insider information to outsiders breaches obligations to the organization, violates the written or unspoken contract, and elicits damaging publicity (Zhang et al. 2009).”
Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis (2017, background): “Previous research has shown that ethical judgment has a positive influence on whistleblowing intentions (Zhang et al. 2009; Chiu 2003) and is moderated by moral intensity (Alleyne et al. 2013; Latan et al. 2016).”
The Determinants of Alternative Forms of Workplace Voice (2012, background): “Similarly, research has examined culture as a possible determinant of prosocial informal voice (Botero & Van Dyne, 2009; Thomas & Au, 2002) and whistle-blowing (Tavakoli et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2009) but has not examined its possible relation to voice surrounding perceptions of mistreatment.”
Ethical Leadership and Internal Whistleblowing: A Mediated Moderation Model (2017, background): “…People’s Republic of China 2 School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University, 422 Siming south road, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China organization, or to the public) is not expected by organizations because it may damage their image (Miceli and Near 1988; Zhang et al. 2009).”
Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs (2009, methodology): “…A more “fool-proof” method may have been to collect more individual-level data from the respondents as well as to conduct the study in a single organization thereby increasing the validity of the fi ndings (see Zhang et al., 2009 for another research that can benefi t from a better design).”
A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011 (2013, background): “Zhang et al. 2009 JBE Behavior There was a significant correlation relationship between whistleblowing judgment and whistleblowing intention in the decision-making process of whistleblowing.”