Reducing the Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Performance Evaluations
By Cara C. Bauer, B. Baltes. 2002
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f4869b0df974aa36cfbc353471787f1f111c240
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Social Psychology
- Stefanie K Johnson
- R. Reichard
- Selamawit Zewdie
- S. Murphy
- M. Heilman
- Eugene Yu Jin Tee
- R. Lord
- Jessica E. Dinh
In Sociology and Political Science
- Suzette Caleo
- S. Murphy
- Selamawit Zewdie
- R. Reichard
- M. Heilman
- Stefanie K Johnson
- Eugene Yu Jin Tee
- Victoria L. Brescoll
Citations in the corpus
- The strong, sensitive type : Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders (2008, methodology): “For example, research has shown that biases in performance ratings for women are diminished when raters are instructed to recall specific behaviors before making their ratings (Bauer & Baltes, 2002).”
- Gender stereotypes and workplace bias (2012, background): “…of explicit and unequivocal information about performance excellence, a structured procedure using specific observed behaviors rather than an overall judgment of an employee is more effective in tempering the biasing effects of gender stereotypes on performance evaluation (Bauer & Baltes, 2002).”
- Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework (2018, background): “…in male-typed fields when ambiguities exist in the quantity and quality of information (Heilman, Wallen, Fuchs, & Tamkins, 2004; Koch et al., 2015), performance criteria (Norton et al., 2004), evaluative structure (Bauer & Baltes, 2002), and teamwork (Caleo & Heilman, 2014; Heilman & Haynes, 2005).”