Interactional Context and Feedback in Child ESL Classrooms.

By R. Oliver, Alison Mackey. 2003

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e76bd1d5772ba2107674fc88a57fe044a09c811

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE (2006, background): “…from a wide range of instructional settings are likely to benefit from a balanced provision of both recasts and prompts+ Depending on the interactional context ~Oliver & Mackey, 2003!, learners are likely to notice the corrective quality of a good number of recasts and to benefit from other…”
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ORAL AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN THE ESL CLASSROOM (2010, background): “Oliver and Mackey ( 2003 ) reported that their classroom learners noticed recasts to a greater extent in an explicit language lesson than in contexts that involved conversational interaction.”
Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake (2006, background): “However, Sheen (2004), based on her findings from an examination of recasts across four different classroom settings, argued that recasts are not necessarily so ambiguous as Lyster claimed.”
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018, background): “However, Oliver and colleagues’ studies (Oliver 2000; Oliver & Mackey 2003; Mackey, Kanganas, & Oliver 2007) have shown that children and adult learners benefit from interaction in different ways.”
LEARNERS' INTERPRETATIONS OF RECASTS (2006, methodology): “…were utilized by the NSs as appropriate+ Provision of NS responses was dependent on appropriate opportunities to do so in the conversation ~cf+ Oliver & Mackey, 2003!+ Task 3, Cause and Effect (Counterfactual) The NS provided the NNS with three sets of cards that depicted a problem that could…”
IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 GRAMMAR (2006, background): “1+ Other studies have examined the relationship between implicit0explicit feedback and learner uptake ~e+g+, Oliver & Mackey, 2003!, but these are not included in this review, which focuses exclusively on the effects of feedback on L2 acquisition as measured in posttests+ The extent to which uptake…”
The relationship between experience, education and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form techniques (2004, background): “Oliver and Mackey (2003) suggested that teachers’ provision of negative feedback in L2 class- room may be influenced by different classroom discourse contexts.”
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “Depending on the interactional context, learners are likely to notice the corrective quality of recasts (Oliver & Mackey 2003), especially in cases where the recasts have been shortened and/or provided with added stress to highlight the error.”