An Empirical Study of Intuition and Creativity
By M. Raidl, Todd Lubart. 2001
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e2bec93ead91042c4668d4fac36bbf29f00329a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Baptiste Barbot
- Todd Lubart
- Franck Zenasni
- M. Sinclair
- Justin M. Berg
- Michael D. Mumford
- Maciej Karwowski
- M. Besançon
In Mechanical Engineering
- Baptiste Barbot
- Franck Zenasni
- M. Sinclair
- Todd Lubart
- Justin M. Berg
- Michael D. Mumford
- Lesley R. Dailey
- Jan van den Ende
Citations in the corpus
- Misconceptions About Intuition (2010, background): “Although this view was disputed later, considering intuition both as a consequence (Sinclair et al., 2002) and an antecedent of creativity (Raidl & Lubart, 2001; Sinclair, Sadler-Smith, & Hodgkinson, 2009), the question of a shared pathway with affect remains to be investigated.”
- Creative Potential and its Measurement (2013, background): “Empirical research suggests that preference for intuitive-thinking style is associated with creative productions (for a review, see Raidl & Lubart, 2001).”