Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy

By Cliff Bowman, Véronique Ambrosini. 2000

1,429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c4c0675dd7af0f1ec9069c4e18a85aaa4b12aef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review (2014, background): “Some contributions have been detected in extant literature and could be fruitfully considered in a new effort to integrate co-creation and the management-oriented theory of value (Bowman and Ambrosini, 2000; Priem, 2007; Pitelis, 2009; Karpen et al., 2012).”
Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective (2007, background): “Bowman and Ambrosini (2000) introduce and differentiate two types of value at the organizational level of analysis: use value and exchange value.”
Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐ and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms (2009, background): “Although both firm-specific and general knowledge resources are critical for firm operations, accumulating firm-specific resources is generally associated with higher risk, since the economic value of such resources is ultimately influenced by exogenous factors such as market conditions (Barney, 200”
Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research (2012, background): “…which is determined by consumers’ willingness to pay, and value capture, which is determined by market structure and resource ownership (e.g., Bowman & Ambrosini, 2000, 2001; Priem, 2001, 2007); (b) recognizing that consumers’ heterogeneity of demand contributes to firm heterogeneity…”
How value is created, captured and destroyed (2010, background): “[…] rather commonplace in the existing RBV of the firm literature for authors to use the term value or even value creation to mean what Bowman and Ambrosini (2000)”
Organizational and institutional barriers to value-based pricing in industrial relationships (2015, background): “The primary motivation to exchange comes from trading perceived use value against exchange value (Bowman & Ambrosini, 2000).”
Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution: How Firms Contribute to Societal Economic Inequality (2018, background): “In defining value creation, appropriation, and distribution, we broadly follow Bowman and Ambrosini (2000) and Lepak and colleagues (2007).”
The Co-Evolution of Organizational Value Capture, Value Creation and Sustainable Advantage (2009, neutral): “8 > ** A > *0*A 8 !”
Corporate Sustainable Development: Testing a New Scale Based on the Mainland Chinese Context (2011, background): “Firms can create value through the goods and services they produce (Bowman and Ambrosini 2000).”
Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity (2010, background): “Total value creation often varies according to the environmental context—the market condition or competitive situation (e.g., Barney, 2001; Bowman and Amrosini, 2000; Brush and Artz, 1999; Miller and Shamise, 1996; Priem and Butler, 2001).”
Entrepreneurial Scripts and the New Transaction Commitment Mindset: Extending the Expert Information Processing Theory Approach to Entrepreneurial Cognition Research (2009, neutral): “Value is said to exist in two forms: use value and exchange value (Bowman & Ambrosini, 2000; Lepak, Smith, & Taylor, 2007).”