Peer Clique Participation and Social Status in Preadolescence.

By Catherine L. Bagwell, J. Coie, Robert A. Terry, J. Lochman. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b943c4508e30a13d2da1e856541e05293e9cd58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Aggression and social status: the moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics (2006, background): “…rejected by peers [e.g., Cillessen et al., 1992] and that at least some aggressive youth are actually central members of their social clique and/or popular within the peer group [e.g., Bagwell et al., 2000; Cairns et al., 1989; Estell et al., 2002; Luthar and McMahon, 1996; Rodkin et al., 2000].”
Peer Relations of Bullies, Bully-Victims, and Victims: The Two Social Worlds of Bullying in Second-Grade Classrooms (2010, background): “In addition, such children appear to be poorly accepted by peers in general and are likely to be restricted to a social network with other bullies and victims who support their social difficulties (see Bagwell et al., 2000).”
Peer Contagion in Child and Adolescent Social and Emotional Development (2011, background): “$w aterm ark-text $w aterm ark-text $w aterm ark-text promote deviant behavior (Bagwell et al. 2000, Dishion et al. 1991, Miller-Johnson et al. 2002).”
Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups (2007, unknown): “, Bagwell et al., 2000), or whether identified in or out of school (Kiesner, Poulin, & Nicotra, 2003), are typically organized to maximize within-group homogeneity (Rodkin, Farmer, Pearl, & Van Acker, 2000). Thus, in recent studies of preadolescents conducted in both Western (e.g., Canada, Finland, ”
Aggressive and nonaggressive rejected students : An analysis of their differences (2006, result): “These results suggest that although rejected students have smaller friendship networks than children socially accepted at school (Bagwell et al., 2000), they perceive higher levels of support from these friends.”
Students with Exceptionalities and the Peer Group Context of Bullying and Victimization in Late Elementary School (2009, unknown): “Popular aggressive youth are more likely to associate with other popular and aggressive peers while unpopular aggressive youth are more likely to associate with non-aggressive and unpopular peers (Bagwell et al. 2000; Farmer et al. 2002).”
Ethnic Heterogeneity of Social Networks and Cross-Ethnic Friendships of Elementary School Boys and Girls (2007, result): “Our finding that girls had larger social network groups than boys is inconsistent with previous research on children’s social networks (Bagwell et al., 2000; Cairns et al., 1995).”
Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. (2003, background): “The cliques in which rejected children participate, on the other hand are smaller (Ladd, 1983), more dense, and more likely to be comprised of other low status children (Bagwell et al., 2000).”