Explaining Entrepreneurial Intentions by Means of the Theory of Planned Behaviour

By M. van Gelderen, Maryse J. Brand, M. van Praag, W. Bodewes, E. Poutsma, Anita Van Gils. 2008

827 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07ca42922b2ec7644f5d74fb6fefbea9e8bd3d58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The interaction between culture and sex in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions (2013, result): “These notions have been repeatedly supported in multiple studies from a variety of national contexts (i.e. Autio et al. 2001; Kolvereid 1996; Krueger, Reilly, and Carsrud 2000; Liñán and Chen 2009; Liñán, Urbano, and Guerrero 2011; Tkachev and Kolvereid 1999; Van Gelderen et al. 2008).”
Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta–Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models (2012, methodology): “An Integrated Model of EI Prior research has argued that the TPB and the EEM overlap as in both models EI is explained by an individual’s willingness and capability (Guerrero, Rialp, & Urbano, 2008; Krueger & Brazeal, 1994; Van Gelderen et al., 2008).”
Putting Entrepreneurship Education Where the Intention to Act Lies: An Investigation Into the Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Behavior (2014, methodology): “This can be accomplished by providing knowledge about accessing resources and dispelling spurious experiences of infeasibility (van Gelderen et al., 2008).”
Entrepreneurial intentions and start-ups: Are women or men more likely to enact their intentions? (2018, background): “The secondary contribution lies in extending the limited literature on the EI-behaviour link (Kautonen et al., 2013, 2015; Kolvereid and Isaksen, 2006; Goethner et al., 2012; Rauch and Hulsink, 2015; Van Gelderen et al., 2015) by examining different time intervals between intention and behaviour in ”
Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers (2008, background): “However, autonomy-driven entrepreneurs may still increase diversity in the economy just because they do things in their own way (Van Gelderen et al. 2008a).”
A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, background): “Some researchers have found PBC to be the most important factor in shaping entrepreneurial intention (Arenius & Kovalainen, 2006; Souitaris, Zerbinati, & Al-Laham, 2007; van Gelderen et al., 2008).”
The moderating role of entrepreneurship education on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention (2016, neutral): “This can be accomplished by providing knowledge about accessing resources and dispelling spurious experiences of infeasibility (Van Gelderen et al. 2008).”
Psychological capital and the startup capital–entrepreneurial success relationship (2016, background): “Several empirical studies show that the three factors emphasized in Planned Behavior Theory are significant predictors of entrepreneurial intentions (Kautonen, Gelderen, and Fink 2013, Tsai, Chang, and Peng 2014; Van Gelderen et al. 2008; Zhang, Duysters, and Cloodt 2014).”