Empirical findings of bullying in the workplace

By H. Hoel, Staale Einarsen, Dieter Zapf, M. Vartia, Cary L. Cooper. 2002

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07b25022e52a594d4b3f90cb89ab40afec8d22ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Active and Passive Accomplices: The Communal Character of Workplace Bullying (2010, background): “Researchers have proposed that this bullygender pattern is due to men enacting overt (and thus more obvious) aggression because of social norms accepting male aggression and men being over-represented in supervisory positions (Zapf et al., 2003).”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, unknown): “(Mikkelsen and Einarsen, 2001; Zapf et al., 2003).”
Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach (2006, methodology): “This difference that is far below the difference Zapf et al. (1996) observed, indicating that the predictive validity of the OCM is not high.”
Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions (2004, methodology): “…exposure to bullying was measured first on the basis of a checklist of negative acts, in which respondents were defined as bullied if they had been exposed to at least one negative act ‘daily’ or ‘2 /3 times a week’ within the previous 6 months (i.e. ‘the Leymann criterion’, Zapf et al. , 2003) .”
The Moderating Effects of Psychological Detachment and Thoughts of Revenge in Workplace Bullying (2008, unknown): “In order to ensure that the hypothesis tests were appropriately conservative, several variables known to covary with workplace bullying (Zapf et al., 2003) were controlled.”