Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs A Multi-Level Analysis
By Ulf R. Andersson, M. Forsgren, Ulf Holm. 2001
325 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/044c87680dd9fba5dabafd7e7cfba24c02d75b6f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Ram Mudambi
- Rajneesh Narula
- J. Love
- Nigel Driffield
- Gert Bruche
- Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
- E. Malecki
- Gabriel R. G. Benito
In Strategy and Management
- Ram Mudambi
- Rajneesh Narula
- Nigel Driffield
- Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
- Gabriel R. G. Benito
- Óscar Martín Martín
- Francesco Ciabuschi
- Gert Bruche
Citations in the corpus
- MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space (2013, background): “The embeddedness of subsidiaries in the local business network is positively associated with their competence development (Andersson et al., 2001).”
- Unpacking the Institutional Complexity in Adoption of CSR Practices in Multinational Enterprises (2016, unknown): “They are the channels for passing relevant knowledge to the headquarters (Andersson et al., 2001, 2002) and from the headquarters to the trading partners and subsidiaries (Tallman and Chacar, 2011).”
- The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “Moreover, the comparative advantage of subsidiary locations, including the embedding in regional clusters conducive to innovation, has become an increasingly important determinant of superior MNC performance (Andersson et al. 2001; Porter & Stern 2001).”
- Dual embeddedness, influence and performance of innovating subsidiaries in the multinational corporation (2014, background): “This is in line with Dyer and Hatch (2006), who argued that network capabilities can contribute to the sustained competitive advantage of firms, as well as Cantwell and Janne (1999) and Andersson et al. (2002), who argued that embeddedness in valuable and competence-rich relationships is a potential”
- Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries (2003, background): “The degree of embeddedness in external business relationships has also been found to influence the development of subsidiary roles (Andersson and Forsgren, 2001; Andersson, Forsgren and Holm, 2001).”
- The multinational enterprise as a source of international knowledge flows: Direct evidence from Italy (2010, background): “Determinants of technology transfer within the firm (Figure 1) Recent conceptual and empirical analysis suggests that the nature of the knowledge flows between parent and affiliate depend on the strategic position of the subsidiary and its relative performance (Andersson et al 2001, 2005, 2007).”
- Expatriation as a Bridge Over Troubled Water: A Knowledge-Based Perspective Applied to Cross-Border Acquisitions (2005, background): “The ability to create and transfer knowledge is generally perceived as a key competitive advantage of MNCs (Kogut and Zander 1993; Andersson et al. 2001).”
- Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration (2011, background): “In line with an open innovation strategy, if the network is comprised of only highly embedded relationships, there is a risk that it will be closed off from new and innovative ideas (Andersson et al., 2001).”