The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time

By A. Pirola-Merlo, Leon Mann. 2004

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/039f732871febf1e176ad6f38d8ba68a95302e5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Mechanical Engineering

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge (2010, background): “Pirola-Merlo and Mann ( 2004 ) stated that team creativity at a particular point could be defined as the average or a weighted average of team member creativity reasoning that individual creativity is a raw material at the beginning and developed into group-level creativity by team member interact”
Why individuals in larger teams perform worse (2012, background): “For example, theory and evidence support a new type of ‘‘fuzzy compositional model’’ of performance in interdependent teams whereby performance of a single member or a small set of members can account for the bulk of variance in group level performance (Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004).”
A Double‐Edged Sword: Transformational Leadership and Individual Creativity (2013, background): “In particular, transformational leaders are expected to intellectually stimulate their followers and thus may activate the followers’ creativity potential (Avolio, 1994; Bass and Riggio, 2006; Conger and Kanungo, 1992).”
The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence (2008, background): “Unfortunately, researchers know very little about how organizations should compose teams in order to reap the creative, synergistic benefits expected from their use (Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004; Taggar, 2001; West & Anderson, 1996).”
Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. (2009, methodology): “Other studies rely on objective criteria to assess innovation at work, counting the number of contributions to a suggestion system or the number of patents or new products (Cardinal, 2001; Frese, Teng, & Wijnen, 1999; Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004).”
Malevolent Creativity in Terrorist Organizations (2013, background): “Team members serve as collaborators and provide feedback in an environment of trust (Mueller & Kamdar, 2011; Paulus, Dzindolet, & Kohn, in press; Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004).”
Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. (2011, background): “Also, studies have examined how group processes and team climate can help facilitate engagement in cognitive processes needed for creativity (e.g., Amabile et al., 1996; Pirola-Merlo & Mann, 2004).”