Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings

By Maryann P. Feldman, Anat Rafaeli. 2002

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/036113d5c33676ed4be636840afa1c028c9dd01f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Revisiting Relational Coordination: A Systematic Review (2021, unknown): “…embrace and use cross-cutting structures is consistent with a more dynamic theory of relational coordination (Claggett & Karahanna, 2018; Gittell, 2016; Thomas et al., 2018) and with other relational theories of change (Bartunek, 1984; Feldman & Rafaeli, 2002; Fletcher et al., 2009; Kellogg, 2009).”
A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines (2003, background): “Though routines have traditionally been associated with stability and inertia, scholars have noted their relation to organizational adaptation (Cyert and March, 1963; Naduzzo et al., 2000; Feldman and Rafaeli, 2002), mutation (Nelson and Winter, 1982),”
Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and Capabilities (2011, background): “Work that emphasizes the performative–ostensive interaction also offers ways to address these multilevel issues (Feldman & Rafaeli, 2002; Pentland & Feldman, 2007; Rerup & Feldman, in press).”
Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects (2002, background): “arguments by Feldman and Rafaeli (2002) suggest that routines are sources of connections and shared under-”
The Cognitive Perspective in Strategy: An Integrative Review (2011, methodology): “Although routines were featured in BDT and in theoretical writings (Bromiley, 2005), Feldman (2000) and Feldman and Rafaeli (2002) were among the first to make the theoretical connection to the SC literature.”
Rethinking job characteristics in work stress research (2006, background): “Further, shared stories and discourses about work that reinforce a shared perception of that job may be passed around incumbents with the same job title, their line managers and others with whom they come into contact (Feldman & Rafaeli, 2002).”
Editorial: Survey Research Design in Supply Chain Management: The Need for Evolution in Our Expectations (2017, background): “…suggests that such disagreements can reflect actual differences in practices, in that each respondent interprets what is to be done through his or her own cognitive filters and then proceeds to perform the practice accordingly (e.g. Feldman & Rafaeli, 2002; Parmigiani & Howard-Greenville, 2011).”
Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective (2008, background): “Institutions affect organizational routines (Boyer and Hollingsworth, 1997; Feldman and Rafaeli, 2002) and help frame the strategic choices facing organizations (Peng, 2003; Peng et al., 2005; Powell, 1991).”
Coworker Relationships and Informal Communication in High-Intensity Telecommuting (2011, background): “The face-to-face encounters that characterize co-located settings are less available for remote employees and their colleagues, but are nevertheless important for developing common ground and building interpersonal bonds (Feldman & Rafaeli, 2002; Hylmo, 2006).”