A Note on the Dimensionality of the Firm Financial Performance Construct Using Accounting, Market, and Subjective Measures

By W. Rowe, J. L. Morrow. 2009

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing Performance Outcomes in Marketing (2016, background): “…Ramaswami 1994; Morgan, Clark, and Gooner 2002) and the more extensive literature in management (e.g., Chakravarthy 1986; Richard et al. 2009) and accounting and finance (e.g., Callen 1991; Henri 2004; Rowe and Morrow 1999) clearly indicate that performance is a complex, multidimensional construct.”
Spotlight on Age‐Diversity Climate: The Impact of Age‐Inclusive HR Practices on Firm‐Level Outcomes (2013, background): “In addition, empirical research has shown the validity of subjective measures and thus provides support for their application to the measurement of organizational and operational performance (Kunze et al., 2011, 2013; Rowe & Morrow, 1999; Wall et al., 2004).”
Age Diversity, Age Discrimination Climate and Performance Consequences - a Cross Organizational Study (2011, background): “Aware of the potential problems regarding the use of subjective performance measures (Starbuck, 2004), empirical evidence has shown that subjective measures are valid and may be applied to gain insight into operational and organizational performance (Rowe & Morrow, 1999; Wall et al.).”