Thinking Twice: Two minds in one brain
By Jonathan St. B. T. Evans. 2010
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01bde81a4d75547fe230790fcb4650af8f0d7622
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “One answer is that they come from processes of hypothetical reasoning and cognitive simulation that are a unique aspect of Type 2 processing (Evans, 2007, 2010; Evans, Over, & Handley, 2003).”
- Cognitive Biases in Performance Evaluations (2016, background): “…theorists in the dual-process tradition have changed their terminology from System 1 and System 2 to “Type 1” and “Type 2” processing in order to capture the belief that there are not only two systems or two minds but many types of processing (Evans 2010a; Stanovich 2011; Evans and Stanovich 2013).”
- Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing (2012, background): “One answer is that they come from processes of hypothetical reasoning and cognitive simulation (Evans 2007, 2010; Evans et al. 2003).”
- Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution (2012, background): “Others (Evans, 2010, p. 5) have characterized the two systems as giving rise to what are called the Intuitive Mind (System 1) and the Reflective Mind (System 2).”
- Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, background): “So useful, in fact, that psychologists have claimed that it gives human beings a higher form of rationality than that found in other animal species (Evans, 2010b, 2013; Stanovich, 2004, 2011).”