Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “We ourselves have argued that many of the features in these property lists are only correlates (and not defining features) and that others have been mistakenly associated with Type 1 or Type 2 processing (Evans, 2012; Stanovich & Toplak, 2012).”
The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “…that differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2 thought: Type 1 processes are autonomous and do not require working memory, decoupled” to prevent real-world representations from becoming confused with mental simulations, thereby supporting hypothetical thinking (see also Stanovich & Toplak, 2012).”
Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population (2014, background): “One type of processing is characterized by intuitive and autonomous processing of information, whereas the other type of processing is analytical and characterized by the ability to cognitively decouple sensory representations (Stanovich & Toplak, 2012).”
Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, background): “Although the precise specifications of the theories differ, there are some unifying themes (Evans, 2008; Stanovich & Toplak, 2012).”