ESM 2.0: State of the Art and Future Potential of Experience Sampling Methods in Organizational Research

By D. Beal. 2015

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/017bfd362ef9b944e9b21a9d871cf6fdc3095e2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Feeling Like an Imposter: The Effect of Perceived Classroom Competition on the Daily Psychological Experiences of First-Generation College Students (2019, background): “…validity—by testing psychological constructs immediately in real-world contexts—and, thus, reduces memory biases relative to other sampling methods (Beal, 2015; Scollon, Kim-Prieto, & Diener, 2003); however, it also has drawbacks (Conner, Tennen, Fleeson, & Feldman Barrett, 2009; Scollon et al.,…”
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019, background): “Utilizing ESM allows researchers to protect against common method bias usually associated with crosssectional survey designs and memory bias where followers have to recall specific behaviors (Beal, 2015).”
Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a Dynamic, Person–Environment Fit Perspective (2017, methodology): “To avoid overtaxing participants during each measurement period (Beal, 2015), participants were randomly assigned four of the eight items from the challenge and hindrance stressor subscales, respectively.”
Serving You Depletes Me? A Leader-Centric Examination of Servant Leadership Behaviors (2020, methodology): “To avoid participant fatigue, we followed the recommendation of Beal (2015) and Uy, Foo, and Aguinis (2010) to use shortened versions of existing scales.4 Servant leadership behavior.”
Mental Health and Social Contact During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study (2020, methodology): “Over the years, EMA has been used in various areas of research, including psychology ( Wichers et al., 2015), psychiatry (Kramer et al., 2014), epidemiology (van der Krieke et al., 2016), and organizational research (Beal, 2015).”
Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, methodology): “…offers contributions that are notably different from the excellent resources about how within-person research should be carried out (e.g., books or narrative reviews; Beal, 2015; Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003; Hektner, Schmidt, & Csikszentmihalyi, 2007; Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010).”
Take a break! Benefits of sleep and short breaks for daily work engagement (2017, methodology): “…reduce recall-bias (having to remember short breaks that were taken during the morning at the end of the working day), and to separate measurement occasions of predictor variables (sleep duration, sleep quality, short breaks in the morning) and the criterion variable work engagement (Beal, 2015).”
Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance (2017, methodology): “We conducted two quantitative diary studies (Beal, 2015; Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003) to test our hypotheses.”
Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person-Specific Approaches (2018, background): “Beyond affect, recent authors have called for finer-grained research using the experience sampling methodology (ESM) across most all research domains (Beal, 2015; Fisher & To, 2012), and several authors have supported the use of person-specific analyses for “intensive longitudinal data” (i.”