Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping.

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning (2020, background): “However, dissociations between aggregate predictions and criterion test performance have also been observed with between-participants manipulations of testing versus restudying (Blunt and Karpicke 2014; Carpenter et al. 2016; Hinze and Rapp 2014; Johnson and Mayer 2009; Kang 2010; Karpicke 2009; Kar”
Studying and Constructing Concept Maps: a Meta-Analysis (2018, background): “More recently, a few studies (Blunt & Karpicke, 2014; Karpicke & Blunt, 2011) found that retrieval practice by writing text is more effective than concept mapping while viewing source text as a means of studying text passages.”
The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis (2018, methodology): “…Johnson & Mayer, 2009; Yong & Lim, 2016), analogical problem solving (Wong, Ng, Tempel, & Lim, 2017), and, of particular relevance to the present study, science‐based texts (e.g., Blunt & Karpicke, 2014; de Jonge, Tabbers, & Rikers, 2015; Dobson, 2013; Hinze & Wiley, 2011; Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).”