N. Verschueren

2005

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom N. Verschueren trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Stanovich
  2. Jonathan Evans
  3. R. F. West

Who trusts N. Verschueren overall

  1. Jonathan Evans
  2. Philip N. Johnson-Laird
  3. Simon Handley

Papers from N. Verschueren's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers N. Verschueren trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?
  2. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  3. The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
  4. Review: Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness and Understanding Other Minds
  5. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
  6. The Intentional Stance
  7. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
  8. Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.
  9. A model of heuristic judgment
  10. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought

Their papers