A model of heuristic judgment

By Daniel Kahneman, Shane Frederick. 2005

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey (2022, background): “In this context, respondents may have used attribute substitution heuristics (Kahneman and Frederick, 2005), wherein they substitute a hard question (e.”
Cognitive Biases in Performance Evaluations (2016, background): “This definition requires the system of beliefs and preferences to be internally consistent and “immune to effects of framing and context” (Kahneman & Frederick, 2005, p. 277).”
The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “Dual-process theories of cognition have received a notably large share of attention in the last decade (Evans, 2008, 2010; Evans & Frankish, 2009; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Lieberman, 2003, 2007; Reyna, 2004; Stanovich, 2004, 2011).”
Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, unknown): “…& Thomas, 2011; Epstein, 1994, 2003; Evans, 2008, 2010; Evans & Frankish, 2009; Gilhooly & Murphy, 2005; Gilhooly & Fioratou, 2009; Kahneman, 2011; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Lieberman, 2003, 2007; Lin & Lien, 2013; Stanovich, 2004, 2009, 2011; Stanovich & West, 2000; Strack & Deutsch,…”
On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “…processes Propositional processes Haidt (2001) Intuitive system Reasoning system Johnson-Laird (1983) Implicit inferences Explicit inferences Kahneman & Frederick (2002, 2005) Intuition Reasoning Lieberman (2003) Refl exive system Refl ective system Loewenstein (1996) Visceral factors…”
Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “…types of general control mechanisms have been proposed (e.g. De Neys & Glumicic, 2008; Evans, 2007, 2008, 2009; Hogarth, 2005; Kahneman, 2003, Kahneman & Frederick, 2005, Stanovich, 2009), and the involvement of diverse brain areas (in particular, the dorsolateral, orbitofrontal, and…”
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. (2008, background): “Kahneman & Frederick (2002, 2005) recently developed a dual-process theory of probability judgment that they link to the generic dual-system theory.”
A User's Guide to Debiasing (2014, background): “To correct a faulty intuition, one needs to pay attention and reflect at least briefly before arriving at a final judgment (Kahneman & Frederick, 2005).”
Do We Know a Successful Teacher When We See One? Experiments in the Identification of Effective Teachers (2011, background): “…of systematic errors in the intuitions of experts, implying that their intuitive judgments may be endorsed, at least passively, by their rational processes from System 2, one of whose functions is to monitor the quality both of mental operations and overt behavior (Kahneman & Frederick, 2005).”
What Comes to Mind (2010, unknown): “Kahneman and Frederick (2005) describe how psychologists think about this process: “The question of why thoughts become accessible – why particular ideas come to mind at particular times – has a long history in psychology and encompasses notions of stimulus salience, associative activation,…”
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, background): “…paradigm, because it is run within subjects, contains cues that might help participants interpret what the experimenter might deem optimal performance (see Fischhoff, Slovic, & Lichtenstein, 1979; Kahneman, 2000; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002, 2005; Kahneman & Tversky, 1996; LeBoeuf & Shafir, 2003).”
Mind the Gap in Mindfulness Research: A Comparative Account of the Leading Schools of Thought (2013, background): “S2, on the other hand, is cognitive, deliberate, consciously effortful, energy consuming, and a relatively slow mode of reasoning (Kahneman, 1991, 1994, 2003; Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman & Frederick, 2005).”