S. B. Olsen
Economics and Econometrics · 2007–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 85 researchers and is trusted by 16 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Economics and Econometrics — 212 citations into it; #4,570 of 23,481 by trust here, #5,099 by citations
- General Decision Sciences — 99 citations into it; #380 of 1,995 by trust here, #494 by citations
- Marketing — 54 citations into it
- Transportation — 37 citations into it
- Safety Research — 35 citations into it
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 23 citations into it; #1,697 of 2,821 by trust here, #1,164 by citations
- Global and Planetary Change — 19 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 13 citations into it
Whom S. B. Olsen trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Kenneth Train
- David A. Hensher
- Michel Bierlaire
- William H. Greene
- John A. List
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Jordan J. Louviere
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Daniel McFadden
- Gregory L. Poe
Who trusts S. B. Olsen overall
- Henrik Lindhjem
- Jill Windle
- S. Navrud
- John Rolfe
- Fredrik Carlsson
- J. Abildtrup
- Kayo Murakami
- G. Tonsor
- David Hoyos
- David A. Hensher
Papers from S. B. Olsen's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. B. Olsen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency
- Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space
- Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation by Kenneth E. Train
- Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
- MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE
- A New Approach to Consumer Theory
- Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates
- A Comparison of Hierarchical Bayes and Maximum Simulated Likelihood for Mixed Logit
- BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models
- Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?
Their papers
- Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study (2008) — 142 citations
- Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009) — 92 citations
- The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012) — 183 citations
- Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments (2011) — 185 citations
- Spatially induced disparities in users' and non-users' WTP for water quality improvements—Testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay (2013) — 163 citations
- Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009) — 248 citations
- Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation (2013) — 157 citations
- An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices (2007) — 202 citations
- Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys (2014) — 113 citations
- Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (2021) — 210 citations
- ‘Entomophagy’: an evolving terminology in need of review (2015) — 95 citations