Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study

By J. Ladenburg, S. B. Olsen. 2008

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd1919b35c4d036a3c41775a2c88d88ea3959afd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, background): “Berrens et al. (2004), Hudson et al. (2004), Tsuge and Washida (2003), and Ladenburg and Olsen (2008 ) a re examples of internet-based SP surveys, but none of these focus on comparability with other survey modes or the quality of the obtained data.”
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012, background): “Starting point effects could potentially explain the observed changes in marginal WTP estimates (Carlsson and Martinsson 2008; Ladenburg and Olsen 2008).”
Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments (2010, background): “However, the use of CE to test preference learning, preference stability and choice consistency is limited (e.g. Brazell and Louviere 1998; Dellaert et al. 1999; DeShazo and Fermo 2002; Holmes and Boyle 2005; Ladenburg and Olsen 2008; Savage and Waldman 2008; Rose et al. 2009).”
German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions (2012, unknown): “In view of evidence from Ladenburg and Olsen (2010, 2008) on gender-specific starting point bias, this procedure was repeated for men and women separately. Again, the null hypothesis of equal coefficients across the first and the last three choices could not be rejected at the 95% significance level”
Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods (2010, background): “Ladenburg and Olsen (2007) find that an instructional choice set will only have an influence”
Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? (2010, background): “The manifestation of this behavior in SP surveys is starting-point-bias (Herriges and Shogren 1996; Ladenburg and Olsen 2008).”
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies (2012, background): “[10,27,36]) that are consistent with this anchoring hypothesis.”
Not bored yet – revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments (2012, background): “See also discussions by Ladenburg and Olsen (2008) in this context.”
Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011, unknown): “(2006) that may be considered best practice along other dimensions) have already been published, or are in the pipeline (see, e.g., Tsuge and Washida, 2003; Berrens et al., 2004; Ladenburg and Olsen, 2008; Lindhjem and Navrud, 2009; Cai et al., 2010).”
Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys (2014, background): “On the other hand, several authors have found evidence of learning effects in CE (Bateman et al. 2008; Cherry et al. 2003; List 2003; Hutchinson et al. 2004; Ladenburg and Olsen 2008).”