An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices
By A. B. Nielsen, S. B. Olsen, Thomas Lundhede. 2007
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d5276ed63a51f858b44af53f7f89f24e217cfdb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Hoyos
- Jeanne Dachary-Bernard
- Colin J. McClean
- Mette Termansen
- M. Rambonilaza
- F. Jensen
- Fraser McLeay
- Chrysostomos Apostolidis
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- David Hoyos
- Jeanne Dachary-Bernard
- Mette Termansen
- M. Rambonilaza
- Fraser McLeay
- Chrysostomos Apostolidis
Citations in the corpus
- Modelling and mapping spatial heterogeneity in forest recreation services (2013, result): “This is to some extend also supported by empirical evidence from other Danish (Nielsen et al., 2007), Irish (Scarpa et al.”
- Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? (2007, background): “Various applications in environmental economics have served to calculate use and non-use values (Adamowicz et al., 1998) (Boxall et al., 1996) and, more recently, to estimate the recreational benefits of forest management practices (Nielsen et al., 2006).”
- The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010, background): “Applications excluding ASCs are abundant in the literature (e.g. Xu et al., 2003; Bienabe and Hearne, 2006; Nielsen et al., 2007).”