Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments
By M. H. Alemu, M. Mørkbak, S. B. Olsen, C. L. Jensen. 2011
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdace9be1fc4b48668d1c0fa4f67a4941d7a985e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- N. Hanley
- Mikoaj Czajkowski
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Kevin J. Boyle
- Roy Brouwer
- Jeffrey Bennett
- Christian A. Vossler
- R. Johnston
In General Decision Sciences
- N. Hanley
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Mikoaj Czajkowski
- Kevin J. Boyle
- Christian A. Vossler
- Jeffrey Bennett
- Roy Brouwer
- M. Ryan
Citations in the corpus
- Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “21 use of attributes to communicate changes to be valued can increase scenario complexity, particularly when the number of attributes is large or simple attribute descriptors do not apply (Arentze et al. 2003; Hensher 2006b; Islam, Louviere, and Burke 2007; Balcombe and Fraser 2011; Dellaert, Donker”
- The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy (2019, background): “Finally, SP methods can also be used to investigate why some people ignore some attributes when making choices (Alemu et al. 2013).”