S. Navrud

Economics and Econometrics · 2001–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 30 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 108 citations into it; #9,936 of 23,481 by trust here, #4,221 by citations
• General Decision Sciences — 35 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 30 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 26 citations into it; #18,167 of 22,756 by trust here, #16,952 by citations
• Global and Planetary Change — 20 citations into it
• Marketing — 12 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 7 citations into it
• Transportation — 6 citations into it

Whom S. Navrud trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Ian J. Bateman
2. M. Mazzanti
3. S. B. Olsen
4. R. Groves
5. Glenn W. Harrison
6. S. Mourato
7. R. Ready
8. Richard T Woodward
9. Jill Windle
10. Tran Huu Tuan

Who trusts S. Navrud overall

1. Ian J. Bateman
2. G. Atkinson
3. Henrik Lindhjem
4. Tran Huu Tuan
5. R. Johnston
6. Luke Brander
7. Roy Brouwer
8. Anna Alberini
9. S. Mourato
10. G. Szolnoki

Papers from S. Navrud's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Navrud trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual
2. Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
3. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
4. Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland
5. Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
6. Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
7. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis
8. Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change
9. Attribute-Based Methods
10. Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews (Land Economics)

Their papers

• Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011) — 163 citations
• Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries? (2004) — 174 citations
• How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? (2008) — 162 citations
• Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability (2002) — 130 citations
• Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands (2012) — 151 citations
• How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? (2001) — 199 citations
• Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe (2011) — 260 citations
• International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests (2006) — 147 citations
• Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates (2007) — 124 citations
• ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update (2013) — 309 citations
• Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to Face Interviews in Contingent Valuation? (2011) — 252 citations
• Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY) (2011) — 159 citations
• Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage (2008) — 167 citations
• The economic value of recreational fisheries in Nordic countries (2004) — 163 citations