Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods
By S. B. Olsen. 2009
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08db3eb8dc95e98e104090873a9f6a715fae381b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation (2013, background): “The relatively high rates of middle-aged people and high-income groups in the sample are not unusual for Internet and mail surveys (Olsen, 2009).”
- Consumers' willingness to pay for renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan (2015, background): “Olsen (2009), which examines themode effect comparing Internet and traditional mail surveys, found no significant differences in the unconditional WTP estimates although differences are observed in the demographics.”
- Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in Small Island Developing States (2021, background): “Online surveys are now widely employed in valuation studies and have been found to yield reliable WTP measures (Lindhjem & Navrud, 2011; Olsen, 2009; Windle & Rolfe, 2011).”
- Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011, methodology): “Following a similar approach to Olsen (2009), Windle and Rolfe (2011) compare an Internet panel sample with a drop-off/pick up paper-based collection method (details of which are unclear).”
- Comparing Responses from Internet and Paper-Based Collection Methods in more Complex Stated Preference Environmental Valuation Surveys (2011, methodology): “Key advantages of internet surveys are low collection costs, rapid collection times, increased flexibility of tailoring questionnaires to respondent groups, and increased automation of data recording and coding (Berrens 2003, Marta-Pedroso 2007, Fleming and Bowden 2009, Maguire 2009, Olsen 2009).”