Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations

By Curt J. Dommeyer *, P. Baum, Robert W. Hanna, Kenneth S. Chapman. 2004

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e856da281b072aacc83c0d25ba43cd362842db7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Goos
2. A. Salomons
3. D. F. Curtis
4. Bert Brockx
5. D. Mortelmans
6. Tena B. Crews
7. S. B. Olsen
8. P. Spooren

In Social Psychology

1. M. Goos
2. A. Salomons
3. Bert Brockx
4. D. Mortelmans
5. S. B. Olsen
6. P. Spooren
7. H. Hornstein

Citations in the corpus

• The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? (2008, neutral): “However, he echoed a warning made more clearly by Ehrmann (2004) that thoughtful participation is best achieved by ensuring the survey is worth students' time, and that using 6.”
• Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, result): “But Forsman and Varedian (2002 )a ndWeible and Wallace (1998) find similar response rates in the two modes, whereas Dommeyer et al. (2004) , McMahon et al. (2003), Leece et al. (2004), and Kaplowitz et al. (2004) actually report lower response rates in internet surveys.”
• Online Course Evaluations: Faculty Perspective and Strategies for Improved Response Rates (2011, background): “If login and/or password information must be entered, a statement of anonymity and confidentiality of entered course evaluation responses must be provided (Ballantyne 2003; Carini et al. 2003; Dommeyer et al. 2004).”
• Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations (2017, background): “Finally, students may be less likely to respond if they are concerned about anonymity of the evaluation (Dommeyer et al. 2004): whether a particular student has such concerns is usually unobserved as well.”
• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Dommeyer et al. (2004) reported average response rates of 70% for in-class surveys and 29% for online surveys.”