Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity

By Michael T. Baglivio, Katherine Jackowski. 2013

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25969db3f4e0aab5f7b709e08b4822b33054240b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kevin T. Wolff
2. Michael T. Baglivio
3. Nathan Epps
4. Alex R. Piquero
5. Jessica M. Craig
6. Erin Wicke Dankert
7. Chris Scharenbroch
8. A. Bogie

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nathan Epps
2. Kevin T. Wolff
3. Michael T. Baglivio
4. Erin Wicke Dankert
5. Chris Scharenbroch
6. A. Bogie
7. Kristen Johnson
8. Christopher W. Baird

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Risk Assessment Instruments in Juvenile Justice (2013, methodology): “The PACT instrument has been validated several times since its original implementation (Baglivio, 2009; see also Baglivio & Jackowski, 2012; Winokur-Early, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012).”
• The Interrelatedness of Adverse Childhood Experiences Among High-Risk Juvenile Offenders (2016, methodology): “These evaluations include two peer-reviewed publications (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio and Jackowski, 2013), one National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) multiassessment comparison report (Baird et al., 2013), and one independent research agency report (Winokur-Early, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012).”
• Do Social Bonds Buffer the Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Reoffending? (2017, background): “Several empirical studies have found the PACT to be a valid predictor of continued juvenile justice system involvement (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio & Jackowski, 2013; Baird et al., 2013; WinokurEarly, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012), with a total N in excess of 130,000.”