The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do Social Bonds Buffer the Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Reoffending? (2017, background): “Several empirical studies have found the PACT to be a valid predictor of continued juvenile justice system involvement (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio & Jackowski, 2013; Baird et al., 2013; WinokurEarly, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012), with a total N in excess of 130,000.”
The Interrelatedness of Adverse Childhood Experiences Among High-Risk Juvenile Offenders (2016, methodology): “These evaluations include two peer-reviewed publications (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio and Jackowski, 2013), one National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) multiassessment comparison report (Baird et al., 2013), and one independent research agency report (Winokur-Early, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012).”
Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity (2013, background): “The overall risk to re-offend score is based on a matrix of the criminal history and social history subscores (see Table 1; see also Baglivio, 2009, for further explanation of PACT domains and scoring).”
A Comparison of Risk Assessment Instruments in Juvenile Justice (2013, methodology): “The PACT instrument has been validated several times since its original implementation (Baglivio, 2009; see also Baglivio & Jackowski, 2012; Winokur-Early, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012).”