A Comparison of Risk Assessment Instruments in Juvenile Justice

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Path to Serious, Violent, Chronic Delinquency: The Harmful Aftermath of Adverse Childhood Experiences (2018, background): “The Full Assessment contains 12 distinct domains: “criminal history, gender, school, use of free time, employment, relationships, family and living arrangements, alcohol and drugs, mental health, attitudes/behaviors, aggression, and skills” (Baird et al., 2013).”
The Interrelatedness of Adverse Childhood Experiences Among High-Risk Juvenile Offenders (2016, methodology): “These evaluations include two peer-reviewed publications (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio and Jackowski, 2013), one National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) multiassessment comparison report (Baird et al., 2013), and one independent research agency report (Winokur-Early, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012).”
Positive Childhood Experiences (PCE): Cumulative Resiliency in the Face of Adverse Childhood Experiences (2020, methodology): “The reliability of the C-PACT, as administered by FDJJ, has been assessed with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of .83 (Baird et al., 2013).”
Do Social Bonds Buffer the Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Reoffending? (2017, background): “Several empirical studies have found the PACT to be a valid predictor of continued juvenile justice system involvement (Baglivio, 2009; Baglivio & Jackowski, 2013; Baird et al., 2013; WinokurEarly, Hand, & Blankenship, 2012), with a total N in excess of 130,000.”