Min Yang

Clinical Psychology · with Coid · 2006–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Clinical Psychology — 43 citations into it; #2,870 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,722 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 33 citations into it; #9,340 of 22,756 by trust here, #8,985 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 12 citations into it; #6,979 of 12,932 by trust here, #5,481 by citations
• Health — 6 citations into it

Whom Min Yang trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. P. Lachenbruch
2. M. Rice
3. Stephen C. P. Wong
4. J. Hunter
5. Demetra Andrews
6. D. Kroner
7. Grant T. Harris
8. M. Campbell
9. K. Douglas
10. P. Gendreau

Who trusts Min Yang overall

1. K. Geraghty
2. C. de Ruiter
3. J. Monahan
4. J. Skeem
5. Christopher W. Baird
6. Demetra Andrews
7. Jessica Woodhams
8. ToniaL. Nicholls
9. Richard A. Berk
10. J. Wormith

Papers from Min Yang's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Min Yang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.
2. The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed.
3. Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r (Law and Human Behavior)
4. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct.
5. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
6. The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions
7. The level of service inventory – revised
8. A Classification Tree Approach to the Development of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment Tools
9. Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. (Psychological Assessment)
10. The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool.

Their papers

• The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. (2010) — 701 citations
• A Comparison of Logistic Regression, Classification and Regression Tree, and Neural Networks Models in Predicting Violent Re-Offending (2011) — 109 citations
• Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence (2011) — 95 citations
• Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain (2006) — 849 citations