Science Current Directions in Psychological Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, methodology): “ at the decision-making point is far more relevant. There 3 has been continued interest in more principled evaluation methods for these programs in recent years (see for instance the review papers of Skeem and Monahan 2011, Hanson and Morton-Bourgon 2009). Predictive models for recidivism have been ”
Risk Assessment Instruments Validated and Implemented in Correctional Settings in the United States (2013, background): “More and more, correctional agencies are recommending—and many now require—the use of structured risk assessment approaches (Skeem & Monahan, 2011).”
Assessing the Risk and Needs of Supervised Sexual Offenders (2015, background): “There is now professional consensus that structured risk assessments are more accurate than unstructured risk assessments (Hanson, 2009; Heilbrun, Yasuhara, & Shah, 2010; Skeem & Monahan, 2011).”
Gender, risk assessment, and sanctioning: The cost of treating women like men. (2016, background): “…moral concerns about the blameworthiness of the offender for committing the crime of which he or she has been convicted, risk assessment can inform decisions about whether—on utilitarian crime-control grounds—an offender should be sentenced to the upper-bound of that range (Skeem & Monahan, 2011).”
A Comparison of Risk Assessment Instruments in Juvenile Justice (2013, background): “For these reasons, Skeem and Monahan (2011) concluded: “Given a pool of instruments that are well-validated for the groups to which an individual belongs, our view is that the choice among them should be driven by the ultimate purpose of the evaluation.”
Forecasts of Violence to Inform Sentencing Decisions (2013, background): “…there is growing support for forecasts of criminal behavior across a range of criminal justice settings in addition to parole hearings: bail determinations, charging, sentencing, and probation/parole supervision (Skeem and Monahan 2011; Pew Center for the States 2011; Casey et al. 2011; Berk 2012).”
Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes toward the Acceptability of Violence (2013, unknown): “Within the field of psychology there is extensive scholarship on topics as diverse as individual risk assessment (see, e.g., Monahan et al., 2005; Skeem & Monahan, 2011), racial differences (see, e.g., Hawkins, 2003; Kubrin & Weitzer, 2003), the relevance of firearms (see, e.g., Cao et al., 2002),…”
Risk Technology in Sentencing: Testing the Promises and Perils (Commentary on Hannah-Moffat, 2011) (2013, background): “First, in many fields of risk assessment (from determining insurance premiums to forecasting the weather), group data often are highly informative when making decisions about an individual case (Skeem & Monahan, 2011).”